Not only will a victory for Democratic Presidential hopeful Barack Obama mean the White House and Congress will be under far left rule, it will also result in the media becoming, if you can believe it, even more irrelevant.
Currently the media believes its job is to harm Republican politicians by any means necessary. Lying, cheating, stealing, writing articles that insinuate John McCain has had an affair despite an overwhelming lack of evidence, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.
I know some of you refuse to believe in press bias, so please let me speak to the rational citizens of the United States for a moment. According to the media, Democrats, especially Barack Obama, can do no wrong.
Hang out with terrorists... ABC is cool with that.
Steal from the rich and give to the poor... AP Analysts Analyze that they like that.
Choose a preacher that says America is to blame for everything bad in the world... MSNBC says, "That's exactly what we've been saying!"
Basically this means the radical liberals in Washington, after an Obama victory, will pass insane laws that hinder liberty and take material possessions away from those to whom they rightfully belong.
The only place you will be able to hear from the couple whose house was taken by the United States Government and given to a bunch of homeless homosexuals so they'd have a safe place to have gay sex, is Fox News. (Unless Fox News is shut down due to the soon-to-be implemented Fairness Doctrine because the liberals running Washington will consider Fox News to be the only biased television network while they deem one Republican for every 200 Democrats on MSNBC completely in accordance with the Doctrine.)
Those in the media left standing after the passage of the Fairness Doctrine will applaud the stealing of the house belonging to the straight white couple and spin it to make it sound like an achievement of Robin Hoodian proportions.
I can already picture the article...
"During the Bush Administration, whenever Joe the Homeless Guy had gay sex with a strange man it was always on top of disease infested syringes in a dumpster behind the Arby's off I-47, which means his partner wasn't the only thing poking Joe in the butt. But thanks to a bill recently signed by President Obama, he'll now have the use of someone else's comfy bed."
Of course an Obama Presidency will mean the end to traditional marriage due to the fact that President Obama, Congress, and the media will ally with each other and pass a law making gay marriage a permanent fixture in America. The Supreme Court won't be able to save marriage as being homosexual will probably be a requirement for nomination.
What am I talking about – having ties to, or previously having been, a terrorist will probably be a prerequisite to being a member of the United States Supreme Court. After all, there will be a lot more terrorists walking around after Obama is elected – and they deserve representation!
I suppose my fear can be summed up by the famous quote "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
The liberals are going to have all the power. The media will refuse to negatively report on any controversial action taken by the Democrats. "It's good that they did that," the press will say in a creepy, Twilight Zone sort of way. Instead of Jonestown, the United States will become Obamatown.
Yes, it's safe to say Democrats will enjoy power of this magnitude and do anything they can to retain it – perhaps even some of the things for which they have previously criticized Republicans.
You liberals need to think about how kindly you take to opposing viewpoints. Do you calmly listen to conservative speakers or do you pelt them with rotten eggs?
Well, if, sometime down the line, you have a disagreement with the Democratic Party which controls the White House, the Congress, the media, as well as the courts, where are you going to turn? Are you going to call your neighbors and start a grass roots movement!? Good idea, but are you sure you and your neighbor are the only ones on the line? Perhaps there was already a similar case where the person with the idea to begin a movement went missing and was never heard from again!
After all, Siberia is a pretty big place, and I have a feeling Putin is one of the first men President Obama will attempt to befriend.
No, the Democrats would never take a, "the ends justify the means" approach!
Well, they are involved in voter fraud (ACORN), they do lie about Republicans (McCain had an affair), they refuse to admit their actual plan (redistribute wealth), they pretend it's the Republicans fault that the economy is in shambles (Democrats forcing Fannie and Freddie to loan money to people who were clearly unable to pay it back).
But people who believe in a "let's look out for the common man," approach wouldn't abuse power, would they?
Sure, there were a few loose cannons who enjoyed butchering their subjects, but that could never happen in America, right?
Oh, it could happen, because to Obama and the rest of his cronies, retaining power by any means necessary is in your best interest; whether you think so or not.
Reexamining Female Suffrage
If you examine the 2008 Presidential poll numbers you'll notice that one group could very well be deciding who occupies the White House beginning January 20, 2009.
Women.
Women currently favor Barack (Hussein) Obama overwhelmingly, while men favor John (I Don't Know His Middle Name, But I Know It Ain't Hussein) McCain.
With rare exceptions, men run everything in the
And, not to belittle her accomplishment, but the business with which she was successful revolves around two things women are notoriously good at: sitting on your butt and shopping.
Sure, there are ladies who are "successful" in politics.
There is Hillary Clinton who rose to the top by marrying a known womanizer who also happens to have the ability to put a voodoo spell on half the country.
There is Nancy Pelosi who rose to the top by doing nothing other than purporting a far left wing agenda in a district full of the most radical left winged people on the face of the earth. If you find someone successful simply for rising to the position of top loon in a land of loons, you have to consider People's
The only truly successful women in politics are Republicans.
Condoleezza Rice comes to mind as a woman who made it based on merit. But unfortunately for those on the left, she does not have a liberal equivalent.
So the gender that hasn't really done much in terms of progress is the one that gets to decide the President?!
Fortunately there have usually been enough smart women to keep a Republican in the Oval Office.
However Democrat Bill Clinton became President because he was charming, good-looking, and full of non-specific ideas that he promised would "change" the country.
Uh-oh!
That's one of the reasons we're looking at an Obama Presidency.
The second reason is because (and this is not meant to be sexist in the least) women don't understand how things work.
Women hear: "I'll cut taxes for 95% of the American people," and they instinctively react, "Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah!" Women don't understand that raising taxes on businesses, which Barack plans to do, will cancel his prospective tax cuts to the working class because of the fact that they, and every other woman, spend their husband's money purchasing goods created by businesses that will pass their tax increases onto the consumer.
They also don't understand that Barack Obama won't cut taxes to 95% of the people because Democrats fundamentally believe in higher taxes across the board!
Again, not to be sexist, but women only care about how things feel – while reality is a pest that should be pushed aside.
That's the reason they're likely to vote Democrat.
The Democrats shovel the following talking points which are very effective in convincing people who don't think...
"We will raise taxes for the rich, who won't miss the money. We will cut taxes for the poor, who desperately need the money."
"Republicans will lower taxes on the rich while offering no relief to the poor because poor people aren't like them – and Republicans despise people that aren't like them."
So if you women would do one simple thing before heading to the polls, I guarantee this country would be better off...
Ask your husband for whom you should vote.
Of course there are some men who make every decision based on irrational emotion...
We call them gays...
...Not that there's anything wrong with being intimate with members of the same sex. In fact, I'd rather they have inappropriate relations with their own kind than make decisions that effect the entire country based on irrational emotion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)