Because I am a peaceful man, I never get into physical confrontations. If I were to find myself in an unfortunate altercation, however, I can say with certainty that the last man I would want by my side is Barack Obama.
Unfortunately the world is a very disturbing place. Yet many Americans are still under the impression that everyone is just as nice as they are. They also believe that if we removed from the mix any action that certain people find hostile, those with whom we're at odds would leave us alone. President Barack Obama is one of those Americans.
He genuinely believes the best way for a victim to handle confrontation is to admit they're at fault and agree to change everything about their life in order to please the aggressor, no matter how moral the victim and how immoral the perpetrator.
In Mr. Obama's world, you should not confront a raging pervert who makes a pass at your wife. You should instead examine your own selfish and antiquated policy that states a couple should remain monogamous after exchanging their wedding vows. And who are you to say a woman should have the right to choose her sexual partner?
In Mr. Obama's world, it's not moral to alert the police should a man or woman steal your vehicle, because your definition of "ownership" is likely oppressive and not relevant in modern society. You considering the automobile you purchased as, "belonging to you" represents greed and oppression. Just because you worked 80-hours per week to afford said vehicle doesn't mean you should have the audacity to assume it will belong to you until the day you decide to sell it. Why should you have a car while those on the sidewalk are forced to go it on-foot?
In Mr. Obama's world, should a man randomly punch you above the neck, you should immediately inquire as to why exactly your face was hideously mangled. Even if the response is, "Because you participate in activities you greatly value," you should change your behavior immediately. If the puncher tells you he annihilated your mug with a wicked left-cross because you work hard, because you attend a Christian church regularly, and because you're teaching your children that violence is wicked - but defending freedom is required by God; even if you're exceedingly proud of every one of these behaviors, you should change your ways posthaste. Based solely on the opinion of the aggressor, you should begin working sporadically, you should only attend worship services approved by your attacker, and you should teach your children that a violent death should come to those who don’t follow the Muslim religion.
With Mr. Obama at the controls, our world, once filled with freedom and prosperity, will cease to exist.
We didn't start out perfect, and no system will ever produce heaven on earth, but, were this country to continue travelling down the path our forefathers laid out, we'd come awful close.
Too bad Mr. Obama turned the cart around.
Conservatives Represent Responsibility
It's difficult for us conservatives to understand why so many liberal elites despise every fiber of our being simply because we believe in small government, the power of the individual, and most importantly: liberty for all.
If you were to place a conservative next to Charles Manson; a liberal elite would debate for hours if asked, "Who do you despise with greater ferocity?"
Liberals claim we conservatives have an overwhelming desire to make the poor suffer by not providing them with a lifetime of entitlements.
Through massive entitlements, we conservatives think you harm the poor by removing motivation that ultimately leads to prosperity and reliance on self. Yet we don't accuse you of hating the poor.
And you couldn't get one sane conservative to say they were vehemently opposed to helping those in need. While government should perhaps play a small roll, we believe charity should be handled by churches and private non-profit organizations.
You don't really believe conservatives despise poor people. You don't really believe conservatives despise minorities. Yet your hate for us knows no bounds.
Is it because we represent authority figures? Is it because we represent work? Is it because we remind you that everyone can’t spend their lives chained to a tree in protest? Is it because we remind you that someone must provide sustenance?
A kid confined to his room because he refused to eat his vegetables temporarily despises his parents even though he knows he didn't follow the rules. He shouldn't have to follow the rules, he thinks. Rationality doesn't come into play. In his mind, he should be allowed to live as he chooses, and has great resentment for those who prevent 24/7 frivolity.
Most children eventually learn that productivity is essential for fulfillment.
But perhaps liberals go through life resenting anyone who reminds them of their duties as a human being.
Perhaps that's why Barack Obama is their hero.
Mr. Obama has never been keen on responsibilities. He's never produced anything. He's managed to live the life most children dream of before they grow up and realize production is a thrill unmatched. He's gone through life perpetrating the illusion that he's helped people simply because he bestowed himself a title, community organizer, that's vague enough to make people assume he's making a huge difference.
But as citizens of the United States are seeing, he doesn't help humanity prosper.
He aims to feed the child in all of us by promising that we'll never be forced to take on any responsibility; that all of us can live a carefree life and society won't crumble. In fact, he tells us that those who've spent every waking hour developing products that fulfill our lives are evil because they had the audacity to profit from their work.
Don't get me wrong, I still remember the rage that resulted from being forced to act appropriately. Before learning the thrill that accompanies simply doing the right thing, my favorite phrase as a child (to anyone other than a school administrator or parent) was, "You're not the boss of me," mixed in with the occasional, "You can't tell me what to do."
Most of us grow out of this phase. But, as a youngster cries "child abuse" because a parent has placed him or her in time-out due to his or her habit of taking an electric lime Crayon to the living room wall, liberal elites cry "hate monger" simply because conservatives believe in teaching the less fortunate to fend for themselves instead of giving them detailed directions to the governmental office that promises to provide the handouts necessary to sustain life.
If you were to place a conservative next to Charles Manson; a liberal elite would debate for hours if asked, "Who do you despise with greater ferocity?"
Liberals claim we conservatives have an overwhelming desire to make the poor suffer by not providing them with a lifetime of entitlements.
Through massive entitlements, we conservatives think you harm the poor by removing motivation that ultimately leads to prosperity and reliance on self. Yet we don't accuse you of hating the poor.
And you couldn't get one sane conservative to say they were vehemently opposed to helping those in need. While government should perhaps play a small roll, we believe charity should be handled by churches and private non-profit organizations.
You don't really believe conservatives despise poor people. You don't really believe conservatives despise minorities. Yet your hate for us knows no bounds.
Is it because we represent authority figures? Is it because we represent work? Is it because we remind you that everyone can’t spend their lives chained to a tree in protest? Is it because we remind you that someone must provide sustenance?
A kid confined to his room because he refused to eat his vegetables temporarily despises his parents even though he knows he didn't follow the rules. He shouldn't have to follow the rules, he thinks. Rationality doesn't come into play. In his mind, he should be allowed to live as he chooses, and has great resentment for those who prevent 24/7 frivolity.
Most children eventually learn that productivity is essential for fulfillment.
But perhaps liberals go through life resenting anyone who reminds them of their duties as a human being.
Perhaps that's why Barack Obama is their hero.
Mr. Obama has never been keen on responsibilities. He's never produced anything. He's managed to live the life most children dream of before they grow up and realize production is a thrill unmatched. He's gone through life perpetrating the illusion that he's helped people simply because he bestowed himself a title, community organizer, that's vague enough to make people assume he's making a huge difference.
But as citizens of the United States are seeing, he doesn't help humanity prosper.
He aims to feed the child in all of us by promising that we'll never be forced to take on any responsibility; that all of us can live a carefree life and society won't crumble. In fact, he tells us that those who've spent every waking hour developing products that fulfill our lives are evil because they had the audacity to profit from their work.
Don't get me wrong, I still remember the rage that resulted from being forced to act appropriately. Before learning the thrill that accompanies simply doing the right thing, my favorite phrase as a child (to anyone other than a school administrator or parent) was, "You're not the boss of me," mixed in with the occasional, "You can't tell me what to do."
Most of us grow out of this phase. But, as a youngster cries "child abuse" because a parent has placed him or her in time-out due to his or her habit of taking an electric lime Crayon to the living room wall, liberal elites cry "hate monger" simply because conservatives believe in teaching the less fortunate to fend for themselves instead of giving them detailed directions to the governmental office that promises to provide the handouts necessary to sustain life.
Dems in the Know are to the Extreme
If you know what's going on in the political word and vote Democrat, you are a far-left kook.
The majority of citizens who regularly vote Democrat, however, have very little clue regarding the inner workings of the Beltway.
The success of Democrats over the years can largely be attributed to their ability to keep the masses ignorant.
Like we're seeing with the Tea Party movement; as average citizens become more and more informed about the issues that impact their lives, the popularity of President Obama and his fellow Democrats greatly diminishes.
Political debates leave an overwhelming majority of people, typically uninterested in politics, thinking Democrats will find a way to give them money earned by other people.
Many of these people are discovering that Democrats actually have a plethora of clever ways to instead take their money. In fact, ordinary citizens are learning that even in these most difficult of economic times, the only desire of the Democrats is to confiscate money from the middle class for the purpose of funding studies on why Italians have an affinity for foods ending in "o" and "a".
It's unfortunate that it takes a troubled economy for so many people to see the light, to see that, were a Democrat politician to listen to the story of how their offspring's college fund had been reduced to pennies, the last of their 401K money was prematurely withdrawn weeks ago, they were unsure if they could keep their home, and the corporation which employed them had greatly reduced their hours, the politician would nevertheless call for an increase in their taxes so those coming into this country illegally can be provided with ample entitlements, so the NEA can make sure "starving" is never again used to describe an unemployed artist, and so some scientist can figure out exactly why Leopards prefer mating with other Leopards.
Democrats don't care about the hard-working little people. They care about the little people who perennially depend on Democrats to provide breakfast, lunch, dinner, as well as the fourth meal.
There will always be communists and socialists in the United States who vote Democrat, or worse. And there are unfortunately a great number of ignorant individuals still under the impression the word "conservative" is a euphemism for "member of the KKK that occasionally misses meetings."
The media helps perpetrate this stereotype with their misleading coverage of Tea Party rallies, but people are finally beginning to learn the truth. Ordinary Americans hear supposedly mainstream members of the media talk about Tea Party events as if it's difficult for attendees to concentrate on the conservative speakers due to frequent shouts of "Heil Hitler". Yet we see little footage of extreme behavior.
Because he knows many folks are ignorant when it comes to politics, Bill Clinton recently told Mr. Obama to continue pushing his agenda to the American people, despite a decline in poll numbers. In other words, Mr. Clinton told Mr. Obama, "People tell you that they hate what you're doing. It doesn't matter. Tell them you're right. Tell them they're so stupid, they don't understand how your policies will help the country thrive. Tell them that all the free stuff you promised will soon arrive in their mailbox. Tell them that it’s not about what they want; it's about what you want. Tell them to sit down and shut up, because it's your country."
Thank goodness people are wising up. Thank goodness they're learning that Democrats will lie to get your vote. They're learning that America became great because success was based on sweat emanating from hard work, and although it means there will always be some without, capitalism cannot be matched.
People are no longer willing to simply allow Mr. Obama to tell them they needn't worry their pretty little faces, as if he's akin to a 1950's style husband, because they know his ideal civilization punishes merit and rewards laziness.
The extreme policies of the Democrats in power are harming this country so badly that the American people are finally catching on, which means future elections will result in fewer Washington Democrats.
The majority of citizens who regularly vote Democrat, however, have very little clue regarding the inner workings of the Beltway.
The success of Democrats over the years can largely be attributed to their ability to keep the masses ignorant.
Like we're seeing with the Tea Party movement; as average citizens become more and more informed about the issues that impact their lives, the popularity of President Obama and his fellow Democrats greatly diminishes.
Political debates leave an overwhelming majority of people, typically uninterested in politics, thinking Democrats will find a way to give them money earned by other people.
Many of these people are discovering that Democrats actually have a plethora of clever ways to instead take their money. In fact, ordinary citizens are learning that even in these most difficult of economic times, the only desire of the Democrats is to confiscate money from the middle class for the purpose of funding studies on why Italians have an affinity for foods ending in "o" and "a".
It's unfortunate that it takes a troubled economy for so many people to see the light, to see that, were a Democrat politician to listen to the story of how their offspring's college fund had been reduced to pennies, the last of their 401K money was prematurely withdrawn weeks ago, they were unsure if they could keep their home, and the corporation which employed them had greatly reduced their hours, the politician would nevertheless call for an increase in their taxes so those coming into this country illegally can be provided with ample entitlements, so the NEA can make sure "starving" is never again used to describe an unemployed artist, and so some scientist can figure out exactly why Leopards prefer mating with other Leopards.
Democrats don't care about the hard-working little people. They care about the little people who perennially depend on Democrats to provide breakfast, lunch, dinner, as well as the fourth meal.
There will always be communists and socialists in the United States who vote Democrat, or worse. And there are unfortunately a great number of ignorant individuals still under the impression the word "conservative" is a euphemism for "member of the KKK that occasionally misses meetings."
The media helps perpetrate this stereotype with their misleading coverage of Tea Party rallies, but people are finally beginning to learn the truth. Ordinary Americans hear supposedly mainstream members of the media talk about Tea Party events as if it's difficult for attendees to concentrate on the conservative speakers due to frequent shouts of "Heil Hitler". Yet we see little footage of extreme behavior.
Because he knows many folks are ignorant when it comes to politics, Bill Clinton recently told Mr. Obama to continue pushing his agenda to the American people, despite a decline in poll numbers. In other words, Mr. Clinton told Mr. Obama, "People tell you that they hate what you're doing. It doesn't matter. Tell them you're right. Tell them they're so stupid, they don't understand how your policies will help the country thrive. Tell them that all the free stuff you promised will soon arrive in their mailbox. Tell them that it’s not about what they want; it's about what you want. Tell them to sit down and shut up, because it's your country."
Thank goodness people are wising up. Thank goodness they're learning that Democrats will lie to get your vote. They're learning that America became great because success was based on sweat emanating from hard work, and although it means there will always be some without, capitalism cannot be matched.
People are no longer willing to simply allow Mr. Obama to tell them they needn't worry their pretty little faces, as if he's akin to a 1950's style husband, because they know his ideal civilization punishes merit and rewards laziness.
The extreme policies of the Democrats in power are harming this country so badly that the American people are finally catching on, which means future elections will result in fewer Washington Democrats.
Are Conservatives Too Nice?
Now that the stakes are incredibly high regarding the future of our country, I'm thinking it's time we conservatives stop being so darn nice.
Let's compare the behavior of liberals to the behavior of conservatives...
If you, a conservative, move to Hollywood, hopeful for a career in the entertainment industry, you are instructed to keep your conservative beliefs to yourself or else be shunned by the entire community.
In liberal dominated bastions, conservatives are afraid to put signs on their lawns, bumper stickers on their cars, and clothes on their bodies showing support for right leaning candidates.
Tea Party protests have all been extremely peaceful, except for the instance in which union thugs physically assaulted an African-American seller of conservative paraphernalia.
No physical harm would come to a Democrat that walked into the middle of a Tea Party rally and loudly declared, "I am a proud liberal!"
Great physical harm would come to a conservative that walked into the middle of a liberal gathering and loudly declared, "I am a proud member of the GOP!" If you're a progressive who doesn't believe this assertion, please attend a liberal event in your area wearing a Glenn Beck hat, a shirt indicating you've been 'Hannitized' while carrying a book authored by Ann Coulter, and then report back to me with the extent of your injuries.
Out of thin air, liberals made up racist quotes, which they attributed to Rush Limbaugh when he was in talks to buy an NFL football team.
Because many Americans on both sides of the political aisle have publicly expressed their opinion that it's unwise to build a mosque near Ground Zero, liberal journalists are writing column after column pretending that anti-Muslim sentiment among conservatives is on the rise in America, when, in reality, there has been little to no backlash against the American Muslim community.
Why do people, supposedly so confident in their beliefs, resort to lying to, shunning, and physically assaulting, their political adversaries?
Simply, because they're wrong. Liberal policies have never led to prosperity, a fact that can't be denied during civilized arguments. Liberals know this, and therefore refuse to engage in civilized arguments.
Because conservatives are keenly aware of the fact that insecurity in their beliefs lead to aggressive action by liberals, we've always turned the other cheek.
But let's start making stuff up. In fact, did you know that Keith Olbermann recently told his Countdown crew that the best way to starve a minority was to hide his welfare check under his work boots?
Conservatives, please start shunning your liberal friends and colleagues. If you're lucky enough to know a liberal is in your employ, immediately inform him or her that their services are no longer needed. Subtly make certain they know that, since they lean to the left, they will never work in your business again.
Delete them as Facebook friends, and then send them texts that say you're so disgusted by their politics that you've forever removed them from your contacts.
Remove signs promoting progressive candidates from the lawns of your liberal neighbors. Key cars displaying bumper stickers calling for the election of Democrats. Loudly scoff at those clad in left-leaning garb. Make them think, the next time they contemplate adorning their body with a pro-Obama t-shirt, "Do I really want to face public ridicule for wearing this shirt when a plain blue number will lead to only smiles?"
I suppose this article is all for naught, as even I don't support what I've suggested.
As over the top as he is, I don't hate Keith Olbermann and wish him no ill will. I certainly wouldn't attribute a vile joke to him unless he actually uttered the words. Despite the fact that he often refers to some of my favorite conservative thinkers as, "The Worst People in the World," I wouldn't even call him that. To me, the worst people in world are Osama Bin Laden, Charles Manson, and others who murder for pleasure.
But it's difficult seeing the decline of America because conservatives don't believe two wrongs make a right, because we don't believe the ends justify the immoral means, because we're compulsive tellers of the truth, because we believe in peaceful dialogue, because, instead of applauding his injuries, we'd actually come to the aid of a battered and bruised liberal lying on the pavement.
It's simply sad to see America fail because we conservatives aren't willing to stoop to the level of liberals.
But, as unfortunate as the results will likely be, I would have it no other way.
Let's compare the behavior of liberals to the behavior of conservatives...
If you, a conservative, move to Hollywood, hopeful for a career in the entertainment industry, you are instructed to keep your conservative beliefs to yourself or else be shunned by the entire community.
In liberal dominated bastions, conservatives are afraid to put signs on their lawns, bumper stickers on their cars, and clothes on their bodies showing support for right leaning candidates.
Tea Party protests have all been extremely peaceful, except for the instance in which union thugs physically assaulted an African-American seller of conservative paraphernalia.
No physical harm would come to a Democrat that walked into the middle of a Tea Party rally and loudly declared, "I am a proud liberal!"
Great physical harm would come to a conservative that walked into the middle of a liberal gathering and loudly declared, "I am a proud member of the GOP!" If you're a progressive who doesn't believe this assertion, please attend a liberal event in your area wearing a Glenn Beck hat, a shirt indicating you've been 'Hannitized' while carrying a book authored by Ann Coulter, and then report back to me with the extent of your injuries.
Out of thin air, liberals made up racist quotes, which they attributed to Rush Limbaugh when he was in talks to buy an NFL football team.
Because many Americans on both sides of the political aisle have publicly expressed their opinion that it's unwise to build a mosque near Ground Zero, liberal journalists are writing column after column pretending that anti-Muslim sentiment among conservatives is on the rise in America, when, in reality, there has been little to no backlash against the American Muslim community.
Why do people, supposedly so confident in their beliefs, resort to lying to, shunning, and physically assaulting, their political adversaries?
Simply, because they're wrong. Liberal policies have never led to prosperity, a fact that can't be denied during civilized arguments. Liberals know this, and therefore refuse to engage in civilized arguments.
Because conservatives are keenly aware of the fact that insecurity in their beliefs lead to aggressive action by liberals, we've always turned the other cheek.
But let's start making stuff up. In fact, did you know that Keith Olbermann recently told his Countdown crew that the best way to starve a minority was to hide his welfare check under his work boots?
Conservatives, please start shunning your liberal friends and colleagues. If you're lucky enough to know a liberal is in your employ, immediately inform him or her that their services are no longer needed. Subtly make certain they know that, since they lean to the left, they will never work in your business again.
Delete them as Facebook friends, and then send them texts that say you're so disgusted by their politics that you've forever removed them from your contacts.
Remove signs promoting progressive candidates from the lawns of your liberal neighbors. Key cars displaying bumper stickers calling for the election of Democrats. Loudly scoff at those clad in left-leaning garb. Make them think, the next time they contemplate adorning their body with a pro-Obama t-shirt, "Do I really want to face public ridicule for wearing this shirt when a plain blue number will lead to only smiles?"
I suppose this article is all for naught, as even I don't support what I've suggested.
As over the top as he is, I don't hate Keith Olbermann and wish him no ill will. I certainly wouldn't attribute a vile joke to him unless he actually uttered the words. Despite the fact that he often refers to some of my favorite conservative thinkers as, "The Worst People in the World," I wouldn't even call him that. To me, the worst people in world are Osama Bin Laden, Charles Manson, and others who murder for pleasure.
But it's difficult seeing the decline of America because conservatives don't believe two wrongs make a right, because we don't believe the ends justify the immoral means, because we're compulsive tellers of the truth, because we believe in peaceful dialogue, because, instead of applauding his injuries, we'd actually come to the aid of a battered and bruised liberal lying on the pavement.
It's simply sad to see America fail because we conservatives aren't willing to stoop to the level of liberals.
But, as unfortunate as the results will likely be, I would have it no other way.
Why Did "You" Vote Obama?
Whenever I encounter an individual who cast their ballot for Barack Obama in November of 2008, I have a burning desire to ask, simply, "What were you thinking?"
However this piece isn't meant to belittle anyone who voted for Mr. Obama, rather it's a call for the duped to reflect upon how they came about their decision, i.e., what did they know and when did they know it.
After all, they voted for a man who has ruined the economy. They voted for a man who favors the religion of terrorists, who brutally murdered thousands of American citizens, over his own religion. They voted for a man whose only desire is to radically transform the greatest country in the history of the world. They voted for a man inspired by a pastor who refers to America as the, "U.S. of KKK." They voted for a man who wants to implement universal healthcare, a system that has caused much misery throughout the world. They voted for a man who equates our founding fathers to the men who ran Nazi Germany. They voted for a man who is suing a state for the egregious sin of trying to protect their own citizens from violent deaths at the hands of illegal immigrants.
What failing in your life caused you to vote for Barack Obama?
Were you simply ignorant?
Ask yourself, Obama voters, did you see the footage his pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, lambasting his own country on multiple occasions? Regarding 9/11, he said, "America's chickens are coming home to roost."
Did you see the footage of Mr. Obama telling a group of his backers that he had a burning desire to witness the eventual passage of universal healthcare?
Did you hear him say he wanted to radically transform the United States of America, and, if so, what did you think he meant?
Did you see footage of him telling Joe the Plumber that he planned to spread the wealth?
If all of this is new to you, ignorance was your downfall.
Perhaps you didn't believe one man could so radically change such a resilient nation. Hopefully your eyes are now wide open, and, before casting your next ballot, you will take the time to read every word, and listen to every speech of the man or woman who has won your political heart. Because the footage and the words of Mr. Obama were available to anyone interested.
Perhaps you underestimated the importance of your vote. "Everything will basically remain the same regardless of who resides in the White House," you may have said to yourself. Maybe that’s why you're so reticent to believe health care rationing is on the horizon, or why you won't admit that Mr. Obama has a deep-seated hatred for his own country.
But now you must face reality. Mr. Obama said he could fix the economy, yet he has failed miserably. He didn't say, "Mr. Bush has so badly ruined the financial system that, two years after I take office, it will remain in shambles." He told you he could fix it, but the truth is he doesn't want to fix it; because economic chaos leads to uncertainty, and uncertainty leads to the election of people who run on platitudes. It was obvious to those of us who did our homework that, once Mr. Obama's agenda came to fruition, America would begin losing her luster. Well, it's official; her luster has been lost. We'd need at least a thousand coats of luster to return to pre-Obama levels.
Don't let liberals make you perennially ignorant. They want you to immediately dismiss the words of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter without giving the substance of their statements a single thought. While you brush aside traditional conservative talk, claiming it's from the mouth of evil hate-mongers, you consider the words of MSNBC hosts and other far-leftists, like Howard Dean, mainstream. But ask yourself, what group of people most closely resemble our founding fathers? By being a good little soldier in the liberal army, you don't realize that you’re actually saying, "Any criticism of Obama is racist, we should nationalize healthcare, social justice is the key to our future, and America is inherently evil."
It's never too late to start reading. It's never too late to begin listening to talk radio and watching Fox News, where you would have learned much of the information I've provided.
You should have known that you're not required to blindly follow conservative talkers. You can dissect their words and come to your own conclusions. But, by allowing the liberal media to convince you that listening to those to the right of Chris Matthews is akin to absorbing a speech by Adolf Hitler, you let them brainwash you so severely that Joseph Goebbels himself would applaud their ingenuity.
By the time the 2012 Presidential election rolls around, about of a quarter of the American people will likely approve of the job Mr. Obama is doing. Instead of business as usual, why don't we start a national, "Where did we go wrong," campaign? Into video cameras, ordinary citizens could tell the story of why they made the decision to vote for Mr. Obama and how, had they spent a few minutes each day taking in vital information; they would have clearly seen the light. They could then upload the footage to YouTube or Facebook.
Where did you go wrong?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama simply because he promised, "hope and change"?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because the media had you convinced he was a centrist?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because you saw an internet video of Tom Hanks asking you to, and you really like Tom Hanks?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because every member of the uber-cool celebrity panel Bill Maher gathered for his HBO program, Real Time, was a staunch Obama-backer, and you've always wanted to run with the cool crowd?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because the economy was hurting and you assumed Republicans were at fault?
Did you decide to cast your vote for Mr. Obama early in the campaign, but, if asked, would not have been able to tell the inquirer one pertinent fact about the man in regards to why he was your choice to run our country for a whopping four years?
Stupidity is difficult to overcome. Ignorance is not.
If you were ignorant, wise up. It's as simple as that.
Like a football player often follows a careless play with a foolish penalty out of instinctive frustration, please don't compound your error by again voting for a progressive. Realize that, in order to win your precious vote, Mr. Obama mislead you regarding his true intentions. He didn't tell you he would ignore the polls and force through health care. He didn't tell you that he would set up several slush funds for the express purpose of keeping his loyal backers happy. He didn't tell you that he would handcuff states so they couldn't protect their citizens against violent illegal immigrants. He didn't tell you he would take Air Force One to every corner of the world and apologize for the sins of the United States.
Had he told you these things, you wouldn't have voted for him. He played you.
Yet, many of us knew the words he used while debating Senator McCain were empty. We had seen footage, often grainy, of him speaking about his true intentions for the United States of America, and knew those words contradicted the ones he used while speaking to the masses.
We weren't fooled.
Why were you?
Please, learn from your mistake.
Don't be embarrassed.
Don't be ashamed.
We all have stories of how one unwise act led to many future decisions thoughtfully based on extensive fact gathering.
Perhaps your story could help someone refrain from erring similarly.
Please, our country hangs in the balance.
However this piece isn't meant to belittle anyone who voted for Mr. Obama, rather it's a call for the duped to reflect upon how they came about their decision, i.e., what did they know and when did they know it.
After all, they voted for a man who has ruined the economy. They voted for a man who favors the religion of terrorists, who brutally murdered thousands of American citizens, over his own religion. They voted for a man whose only desire is to radically transform the greatest country in the history of the world. They voted for a man inspired by a pastor who refers to America as the, "U.S. of KKK." They voted for a man who wants to implement universal healthcare, a system that has caused much misery throughout the world. They voted for a man who equates our founding fathers to the men who ran Nazi Germany. They voted for a man who is suing a state for the egregious sin of trying to protect their own citizens from violent deaths at the hands of illegal immigrants.
What failing in your life caused you to vote for Barack Obama?
Were you simply ignorant?
Ask yourself, Obama voters, did you see the footage his pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, lambasting his own country on multiple occasions? Regarding 9/11, he said, "America's chickens are coming home to roost."
Did you see the footage of Mr. Obama telling a group of his backers that he had a burning desire to witness the eventual passage of universal healthcare?
Did you hear him say he wanted to radically transform the United States of America, and, if so, what did you think he meant?
Did you see footage of him telling Joe the Plumber that he planned to spread the wealth?
If all of this is new to you, ignorance was your downfall.
Perhaps you didn't believe one man could so radically change such a resilient nation. Hopefully your eyes are now wide open, and, before casting your next ballot, you will take the time to read every word, and listen to every speech of the man or woman who has won your political heart. Because the footage and the words of Mr. Obama were available to anyone interested.
Perhaps you underestimated the importance of your vote. "Everything will basically remain the same regardless of who resides in the White House," you may have said to yourself. Maybe that’s why you're so reticent to believe health care rationing is on the horizon, or why you won't admit that Mr. Obama has a deep-seated hatred for his own country.
But now you must face reality. Mr. Obama said he could fix the economy, yet he has failed miserably. He didn't say, "Mr. Bush has so badly ruined the financial system that, two years after I take office, it will remain in shambles." He told you he could fix it, but the truth is he doesn't want to fix it; because economic chaos leads to uncertainty, and uncertainty leads to the election of people who run on platitudes. It was obvious to those of us who did our homework that, once Mr. Obama's agenda came to fruition, America would begin losing her luster. Well, it's official; her luster has been lost. We'd need at least a thousand coats of luster to return to pre-Obama levels.
Don't let liberals make you perennially ignorant. They want you to immediately dismiss the words of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter without giving the substance of their statements a single thought. While you brush aside traditional conservative talk, claiming it's from the mouth of evil hate-mongers, you consider the words of MSNBC hosts and other far-leftists, like Howard Dean, mainstream. But ask yourself, what group of people most closely resemble our founding fathers? By being a good little soldier in the liberal army, you don't realize that you’re actually saying, "Any criticism of Obama is racist, we should nationalize healthcare, social justice is the key to our future, and America is inherently evil."
It's never too late to start reading. It's never too late to begin listening to talk radio and watching Fox News, where you would have learned much of the information I've provided.
You should have known that you're not required to blindly follow conservative talkers. You can dissect their words and come to your own conclusions. But, by allowing the liberal media to convince you that listening to those to the right of Chris Matthews is akin to absorbing a speech by Adolf Hitler, you let them brainwash you so severely that Joseph Goebbels himself would applaud their ingenuity.
By the time the 2012 Presidential election rolls around, about of a quarter of the American people will likely approve of the job Mr. Obama is doing. Instead of business as usual, why don't we start a national, "Where did we go wrong," campaign? Into video cameras, ordinary citizens could tell the story of why they made the decision to vote for Mr. Obama and how, had they spent a few minutes each day taking in vital information; they would have clearly seen the light. They could then upload the footage to YouTube or Facebook.
Where did you go wrong?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama simply because he promised, "hope and change"?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because the media had you convinced he was a centrist?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because you saw an internet video of Tom Hanks asking you to, and you really like Tom Hanks?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because every member of the uber-cool celebrity panel Bill Maher gathered for his HBO program, Real Time, was a staunch Obama-backer, and you've always wanted to run with the cool crowd?
Did you vote for Mr. Obama because the economy was hurting and you assumed Republicans were at fault?
Did you decide to cast your vote for Mr. Obama early in the campaign, but, if asked, would not have been able to tell the inquirer one pertinent fact about the man in regards to why he was your choice to run our country for a whopping four years?
Stupidity is difficult to overcome. Ignorance is not.
If you were ignorant, wise up. It's as simple as that.
Like a football player often follows a careless play with a foolish penalty out of instinctive frustration, please don't compound your error by again voting for a progressive. Realize that, in order to win your precious vote, Mr. Obama mislead you regarding his true intentions. He didn't tell you he would ignore the polls and force through health care. He didn't tell you that he would set up several slush funds for the express purpose of keeping his loyal backers happy. He didn't tell you that he would handcuff states so they couldn't protect their citizens against violent illegal immigrants. He didn't tell you he would take Air Force One to every corner of the world and apologize for the sins of the United States.
Had he told you these things, you wouldn't have voted for him. He played you.
Yet, many of us knew the words he used while debating Senator McCain were empty. We had seen footage, often grainy, of him speaking about his true intentions for the United States of America, and knew those words contradicted the ones he used while speaking to the masses.
We weren't fooled.
Why were you?
Please, learn from your mistake.
Don't be embarrassed.
Don't be ashamed.
We all have stories of how one unwise act led to many future decisions thoughtfully based on extensive fact gathering.
Perhaps your story could help someone refrain from erring similarly.
Please, our country hangs in the balance.
The Liberal Mentality
The fact that liberals dominate the entertainment industry is amusing.
Mention conservatives to a showbiz professional and they'll likely throw a hissy fit.
Yet, when you compare behavior they consider acceptable with the policies of conservatives...
Let's take David Letterman... The supposedly monogamous Mr. Letterman used his immense power and fame to sleep with many young female underlings, while, during his nightly chat-fest, routinely criticizing Republicans for being disgraceful enough to attempt to lower the taxes of gainfully employed Americans attempting to raise their children while not letting money issues become a burden on their faithful relationships.
The liberal says, "I'm for policies that help the poor. Tax the rich! Damn the swine who feel otherwise! Now, please have someone from HR line up the most well endowed female interns because I have the house to myself for the majority of the evening as my domestic partner is planning to spend the next few hours back-to-school shopping with our kid."
To liberals, no behavior that directly hurts a fellow human being is wrong. Cheating on your wife is not necessarily a sin in the eyes of the liberal. However, when everyone is left to fend for themselves, they find utterly unacceptable the pain that eventually finds underachievers.
The liberal says, "With counseling, my wife will get over the few games of grab-ass I played with at least one dame from every school in the Southeastern Conference, but forcing a couch potato to watch his go-getting neighbor drive a fancy car is an injustice by which I cannot abide!"
Liberals believe that admitted statutory rapist Roman Polanski should be cleared of all charges despite the fact that he has never been punished for the vile act he committed upon a child.
Their attitude indicates liberals would eagerly endorse a plan to parade a group of prepubescent teens and low-level employees in front of comedians, directors, actors and Hollywood executives so that the industry giants may have their way with them.
If any of you perverts out there ever get nabbed in a Dateline NBC: To Catch a Predator sting, your best bet is to answer Chris Hansen's questions regarding the audacity of your actions with, "For most people, soliciting sex with an underage girl is morally reprehensible, but I direct really well."
Liberal elites believe that as long as they stand up for policies that assist an overwhelming majority of the population, it’s okay to use a few as sex slaves.
It's like how Al Gore sees nothing wrong with flying around in private jets while telling us to read in the dark.
As long as Mr. Letterman champions policies that will help the everyday slacker focus every waking moment on "World of Warcraft," liberals deem it okay for the one-time-funnyman to make sexual advances to recent college grads whose fathers didn’t dream their little girls would have been safer taking a job traveling around Tijuana on a Girls Gone Wild bus asking the daughters of drug kingpins to lift up their shirts for the camera.
I don't see why anyone would proudly stand with Democrats when no sane parent would allow their teenage daughter within a hundred yards of most male leftists. Not ones in the entertainment industry, or the political arena.
Because of his nefarious relationship with an intern, not Bill Clinton.
Due to his alleged propositioning of multiple masseuses, not Al Gore.
Because he enjoys sleeping with young underlings, not David Letterman.
Because he has trouble making connections with women his own age, not Roman Polanski.
It's sad to say, but if I were forced to allow my teenage daughter to fraternize with one male liberal for an extended period of time, I would probably choose William Ayers. At least it's been a few years since he tried to blow up a police officer...
Mention conservatives to a showbiz professional and they'll likely throw a hissy fit.
Yet, when you compare behavior they consider acceptable with the policies of conservatives...
Let's take David Letterman... The supposedly monogamous Mr. Letterman used his immense power and fame to sleep with many young female underlings, while, during his nightly chat-fest, routinely criticizing Republicans for being disgraceful enough to attempt to lower the taxes of gainfully employed Americans attempting to raise their children while not letting money issues become a burden on their faithful relationships.
The liberal says, "I'm for policies that help the poor. Tax the rich! Damn the swine who feel otherwise! Now, please have someone from HR line up the most well endowed female interns because I have the house to myself for the majority of the evening as my domestic partner is planning to spend the next few hours back-to-school shopping with our kid."
To liberals, no behavior that directly hurts a fellow human being is wrong. Cheating on your wife is not necessarily a sin in the eyes of the liberal. However, when everyone is left to fend for themselves, they find utterly unacceptable the pain that eventually finds underachievers.
The liberal says, "With counseling, my wife will get over the few games of grab-ass I played with at least one dame from every school in the Southeastern Conference, but forcing a couch potato to watch his go-getting neighbor drive a fancy car is an injustice by which I cannot abide!"
Liberals believe that admitted statutory rapist Roman Polanski should be cleared of all charges despite the fact that he has never been punished for the vile act he committed upon a child.
Their attitude indicates liberals would eagerly endorse a plan to parade a group of prepubescent teens and low-level employees in front of comedians, directors, actors and Hollywood executives so that the industry giants may have their way with them.
If any of you perverts out there ever get nabbed in a Dateline NBC: To Catch a Predator sting, your best bet is to answer Chris Hansen's questions regarding the audacity of your actions with, "For most people, soliciting sex with an underage girl is morally reprehensible, but I direct really well."
Liberal elites believe that as long as they stand up for policies that assist an overwhelming majority of the population, it’s okay to use a few as sex slaves.
It's like how Al Gore sees nothing wrong with flying around in private jets while telling us to read in the dark.
As long as Mr. Letterman champions policies that will help the everyday slacker focus every waking moment on "World of Warcraft," liberals deem it okay for the one-time-funnyman to make sexual advances to recent college grads whose fathers didn’t dream their little girls would have been safer taking a job traveling around Tijuana on a Girls Gone Wild bus asking the daughters of drug kingpins to lift up their shirts for the camera.
I don't see why anyone would proudly stand with Democrats when no sane parent would allow their teenage daughter within a hundred yards of most male leftists. Not ones in the entertainment industry, or the political arena.
Because of his nefarious relationship with an intern, not Bill Clinton.
Due to his alleged propositioning of multiple masseuses, not Al Gore.
Because he enjoys sleeping with young underlings, not David Letterman.
Because he has trouble making connections with women his own age, not Roman Polanski.
It's sad to say, but if I were forced to allow my teenage daughter to fraternize with one male liberal for an extended period of time, I would probably choose William Ayers. At least it's been a few years since he tried to blow up a police officer...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)