President Barack Obama recently insisted that he'd rather be a great one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.
Were he ever hired into the private sector, I'm sure Mr. Obama would have informed his boss, "I'd rather be a great employee and get fired on the first day than a mediocre employee who spends a lifetime working for your company."
Mr. Obama has a burning desire to exit the White House after only four years while citizens of the United States scream, "Why did you pass healthcare, we hate it!" and, "Why didn't you focus on jobs, we need them!" To hear those words after being prematurely voted out of office would make Obama feel as if he did a bang-up job.
I'm sure academics would agree with him.
In the chapter entitled, "The Greatest President Ever" words similar to the ones below would appear in textbooks across the country.
"What made President Obama special was his ability to ignore the wishes of the American people. He knew what was best for both his subjects, as well as the entire population of earth. Because most citizens of the United States are natural born oppressors who value their own selfish desires over the good of humanity, Mr. Obama's only chance to improve mankind was to implement unpopular policies the ignorant masses didn't realize would benefit their future. He selflessly sacrificed a second term so his people could live better lives and social justice could be achieved."
As president, Mr. Obama has spent many days apologizing for the past actions of the United States. He has vowed to change our self-indulgent behavior for the betterment of the world.
Such apologies and promises are akin to Mr. Obama saying to his private sector employer, "I will not strive to help us sell more of the products we manufacture. Selling more than our fair share harms the environment and leads to the concentration of excessive wealth in our bank account. Have you ever stopped to think about the bank accounts of your competitors? My job, as your employer, is to make sure the ledger sheet of you and your peers are equal. If you think, because you sign my paycheck, I will only help you succeed; you're not a part of the global world. I care about the well being of your competitors more than I care about the well being of this company. The first thing I must do is speak to the boards of our rivals and make sure they understand how sorry we are for making superior products. I will inform them that our success was before my arrival and will not continue on my watch."
President Obama's only concern is bringing everybody down. If he was hired by Nike to sell shoes, he would not take it upon himself to create new marketing strategies that benefit Nike, rather he would damage the once great company so much that the longtime maker of Air Jordan's would eventually have sales receipts equaling those of Dan's Discount Injury-Inducing Shoe Company.
A fictitious private sector Barack Obama wouldn't concern himself with employees of the company he ran into the ground, just like the very real President Obama has made it perfectly clear that he's unmoved by the plight of the unemployed in America.
Before the entire company went bankrupt, "private sector Obama" would elevate the status of its lower level workers. Though they did nothing to deserve a promotion, he would make them equal to those who for years had toiled tirelessly to help the company prosper.
In order to justify his actions, Mr. Obama would ridicule and demean the accomplishments of the successful.
It perfectly sums up liberalism: hard work deserves criticism. Excellence deserves accusations of corruption. A mentality of entitlement deserves honor.
It's backwards.
It's liberalism.
What else would you expect from people who swell with pride after having failed the entire country?
It was their goal from day one.
The Love-Hate Relationship with Barack Obama
There is rampant speculation by many on the far-left that President Barack Obama is rapidly losing his popularity solely due to the color of his skin. But didn't 80% of the population approve of the man on inauguration day? Are far-leftists arguing that it wasn't until after they voted him into office did people begin realizing they weren't comfortable with an African-American man residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue?
Are Americans saying, "On second thought, I do have a problem with the race of our current president and therefore will indicate to any pollster who calls on the telephone that I disapprove of the job Mr. Obama is doing despite the fact that I remain an ardent supporter of every single one of his ideas. As a result of my poll responses, hopefully we can get a white guy back running the show, even if said honkey's positions will damage the country."
Perhaps far-leftists are correct in their claim that the overwhelming majority of Americans are indeed closeted racists? Sure, we tried living a non-racist lifestyle, but in the end simply couldn't bury the truth and now must admit that we despise people with skin color different than our own. Forgive us, for we were born racist.
Or maybe this is what happened...
The American people received a wake up call when it became evident, early in his presidency, that Obama considers most of us to be capitalist pigs. It took some longer than others to realize, but the majority of reasonable Americans are now keenly aware of the fact that, because so many individuals living in our country hold center-right viewpoints, citizens of the United States do not poll well in the First Household.
Barack Obama only likes people unwilling to help themselves; people who sit in their dingy apartments playing video games as they wait for a president to come along and implement policies that allow them to live comfortably while achieving nothing more than progressing to the next level with 50,000 bonus points and the occasional power-up.
Those are the only individuals for whom President Obama has an affinity.
He wants you to want him.
He needs you to need him.
I can't imagine how crushing it was for people to learn that the man they loved so much not only does not reciprocate said feelings of admiration, but considers them the cause of what ails the world.
So we must give these poor souls time, for they likely remain optimistic Mr. Obama has something up his sleeve.
We conservatives would feel the same way if Rush Limbaugh went astray on his uber-popular radio show.
At first we wouldn't believe it.
We'd say, "Did the Doctor of Democracy just claim that he believes the Federal Government should mandate the kind of car we drive because we're too stupid to make appropriate automotive decisions? He's up to something. Wait for it... Wait for it..."
It would take us a while to come to grips with the reality that we were waiting for a reversal that was never going to happen.
It's not a perfect analogy because Rush has established a decades long track record, whereas, prior to being elected President of the United States, Mr. Obama had a career that equaled the time it takes Tiger Woods to seduce a porn star, but you get my drift.
So please give those who genuinely love Barack Obama time to accept the simple fact that he despises ever fiber of their being.
Are Americans saying, "On second thought, I do have a problem with the race of our current president and therefore will indicate to any pollster who calls on the telephone that I disapprove of the job Mr. Obama is doing despite the fact that I remain an ardent supporter of every single one of his ideas. As a result of my poll responses, hopefully we can get a white guy back running the show, even if said honkey's positions will damage the country."
Perhaps far-leftists are correct in their claim that the overwhelming majority of Americans are indeed closeted racists? Sure, we tried living a non-racist lifestyle, but in the end simply couldn't bury the truth and now must admit that we despise people with skin color different than our own. Forgive us, for we were born racist.
Or maybe this is what happened...
The American people received a wake up call when it became evident, early in his presidency, that Obama considers most of us to be capitalist pigs. It took some longer than others to realize, but the majority of reasonable Americans are now keenly aware of the fact that, because so many individuals living in our country hold center-right viewpoints, citizens of the United States do not poll well in the First Household.
Barack Obama only likes people unwilling to help themselves; people who sit in their dingy apartments playing video games as they wait for a president to come along and implement policies that allow them to live comfortably while achieving nothing more than progressing to the next level with 50,000 bonus points and the occasional power-up.
Those are the only individuals for whom President Obama has an affinity.
He wants you to want him.
He needs you to need him.
I can't imagine how crushing it was for people to learn that the man they loved so much not only does not reciprocate said feelings of admiration, but considers them the cause of what ails the world.
So we must give these poor souls time, for they likely remain optimistic Mr. Obama has something up his sleeve.
We conservatives would feel the same way if Rush Limbaugh went astray on his uber-popular radio show.
At first we wouldn't believe it.
We'd say, "Did the Doctor of Democracy just claim that he believes the Federal Government should mandate the kind of car we drive because we're too stupid to make appropriate automotive decisions? He's up to something. Wait for it... Wait for it..."
It would take us a while to come to grips with the reality that we were waiting for a reversal that was never going to happen.
It's not a perfect analogy because Rush has established a decades long track record, whereas, prior to being elected President of the United States, Mr. Obama had a career that equaled the time it takes Tiger Woods to seduce a porn star, but you get my drift.
So please give those who genuinely love Barack Obama time to accept the simple fact that he despises ever fiber of their being.
If Smart People Vote Far-Left; Why is the World Void of Socialist Utopias?
Radical left-wing "comedian" Bill Maher recently said that the majority of his fellow countrypersons aren't bright enough to know what's good for them, which he claims is the reason most Americans don't support policies pushed by the Democrat Party.
By that logic, the state of California is filled with some of the brightest minds in the history of the world.
But, despite a Republican-In-Name-Only Governor, Democrats have run California into the ground. Seems the governor, who had no trouble saving humanity from make-believe villains, can't pay the very real bills.
In Mr. Maher's world, results aren't the least bit important.
I suppose Mr. Maher considers brilliant a patriarch who longingly gazes at a homeless family standing around a skid row trash can while thinking to himself, "The decisions I make in running my household will be identical to the decisions made by that grime-covered father at whom I stare."
Why leftists can't accept the fact that communism/socialism has never worked is beyond me. They always contend that communism/socialism will someday exceed our wildest expectations if we just do a little tweaking.
But why tweak a horrific system when a near-perfect system, as proven by the historic prosperity of the United States, is already in place?
Mr. Maher, would it be brilliant to work on your finely tuned Mercedes-Benz until it drove like one of those Toyotas that randomly accelerates at inopportune times?
To Mr. Maher, brilliance is giving control to individuals whose only objective is increasing the amount of power they wield. He wants the country run by modern day versions of Jim Jones, Charles Manson and David Koresh; all of whose followers Mr. Maher must consider to have been highly intelligent. "Drinking that cyanide laced Flavor-Aide was a brilliant move by residents of Jonestown," we're likely to hear in a future episode of Real Time with Bill Maher.
If Mr. Maher had a kid, I'm sure he'd tell him or her to submit without question to any stranger who asked the little tyke to fully submit to the supposed do-gooders every whim.
And I must mention that, throughout history, many individuals, subjected to tyrannical rule, wound up dead as a result of actions taken by their leaders.
Because healthcare rationing is an enormous part of the Democrats healthcare reform plan, it is crystal clear that policies proposed by Obama and his ilk will cause the death of Americans who otherwise would have had a chance at survival.
So, according to Mr. Maher, if you don't support policies that could directly lead to your death you're severely lacking in intelligence.
If someone proposed a piece of legislation that mandated anyone with the name Bill Maher must cease to exist by force of government, I sincerely hope the political commentator would be smart enough to support it. After all, he considers us short on smarts for not backing policies that could move up our appointment with the undertaker.
By that logic, the state of California is filled with some of the brightest minds in the history of the world.
But, despite a Republican-In-Name-Only Governor, Democrats have run California into the ground. Seems the governor, who had no trouble saving humanity from make-believe villains, can't pay the very real bills.
In Mr. Maher's world, results aren't the least bit important.
I suppose Mr. Maher considers brilliant a patriarch who longingly gazes at a homeless family standing around a skid row trash can while thinking to himself, "The decisions I make in running my household will be identical to the decisions made by that grime-covered father at whom I stare."
Why leftists can't accept the fact that communism/socialism has never worked is beyond me. They always contend that communism/socialism will someday exceed our wildest expectations if we just do a little tweaking.
But why tweak a horrific system when a near-perfect system, as proven by the historic prosperity of the United States, is already in place?
Mr. Maher, would it be brilliant to work on your finely tuned Mercedes-Benz until it drove like one of those Toyotas that randomly accelerates at inopportune times?
To Mr. Maher, brilliance is giving control to individuals whose only objective is increasing the amount of power they wield. He wants the country run by modern day versions of Jim Jones, Charles Manson and David Koresh; all of whose followers Mr. Maher must consider to have been highly intelligent. "Drinking that cyanide laced Flavor-Aide was a brilliant move by residents of Jonestown," we're likely to hear in a future episode of Real Time with Bill Maher.
If Mr. Maher had a kid, I'm sure he'd tell him or her to submit without question to any stranger who asked the little tyke to fully submit to the supposed do-gooders every whim.
And I must mention that, throughout history, many individuals, subjected to tyrannical rule, wound up dead as a result of actions taken by their leaders.
Because healthcare rationing is an enormous part of the Democrats healthcare reform plan, it is crystal clear that policies proposed by Obama and his ilk will cause the death of Americans who otherwise would have had a chance at survival.
So, according to Mr. Maher, if you don't support policies that could directly lead to your death you're severely lacking in intelligence.
If someone proposed a piece of legislation that mandated anyone with the name Bill Maher must cease to exist by force of government, I sincerely hope the political commentator would be smart enough to support it. After all, he considers us short on smarts for not backing policies that could move up our appointment with the undertaker.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)