How Can You Hate America and Not Be Un-American?

Wo, hold on there (insert name of any radical left-winged loon; whether it be Democratic pundit, Hollywood celebrity, or mainstream media personality)! You criticize everything America does and wish we were more like our European "allies," yet, according to you, you are not "un-American."

Not only that, you are deeply offended at the suggestion you are rabidly anti-United States.

I know your thinking is backward, but it's hard to believe even you can assert that you love America.

After all, I don't think this country was founded by brave men and women who held two party talks with the British until the Red Coats decided to leave America and return to the Mother Country.

You'll have to excuse some conservatives who don't think you're pro-American because you openly state that there are hundreds of countries whose policies you favor over ours.

"I like Dr. Pepper the best; followed by RC Cola, A&W Root Beer, Pepsi and then Coke. But don't you dare try and insinuate that I am not pro-Coke, because I love Coke very much; I just want to change its formula so that it tastes exactly like Dr. Pepper, but you can't equate that with anything other than true love for Coke."

It sounds pretty absurd when you put it like that, but it's exactly how the radical left think: "We love America; now what’s the most effective way to go about changing everything about it."

Now, I'm not saying I don’t have a problem with Barack Obama's plan to drastically change the way things are done in America. You can bet I will be the first to throw a fit if there comes a time I can't go to the doctor of my choice because "ObamaCare" mandates I see a doctor who got his PhD from the Guatemala School of Medicine.

But the difference between you and me is that I want things in America to be the way our forefathers envisioned, while you want America to be like the country we defeated for our independence. England isn't as horrible as some of the other European countries, but you get the idea.

So, (insert name of any radical left-winged loon; whether it be Democratic pundit, Hollywood celebrity, or mainstream media personality), the next time you talk about how much you loathe this country and everything it stands for, think about the fact that it is exactly the same way I feel about you, and I don't think you'd consider me pro-(insert name of any radical left-winged loon; whether it be Democratic pundit, Hollywood celebrity, or mainstream media personality).

President Bush's Approval Rating is Perfect

On an average day, how many sane people do run across? I know I can count on one hand how many reasonable people with whom I come in contact.

In other words, the amount of people with their heads on straight in this country and around the world is extremely low.

So it doesn't bother me that these freaks think President Bush is doing a bad job.

Most people's belief system is so out of whack it would concern me if they agreed with the President's policies. So why is everyone up in arms about Bush's low approval ratings?

That's why President Bush is a great President. He doesn't care about approval unless it's self-approval. If he approves of himself then he's doing a good job. That's the bottom line and his only concern. After all, we didn't elect him to do what we wanted; we elected him to do what he wanted.

When you leave your house every day do you act in accordance with the wants and needs of others, or do you act how you want you to act?

And what do we call those who live their lives accommodating the wishes of others? We call them spineless cowards.

It's liberals who always pay attention to the polls. "We'll only change things if people want them changed," is what they say. "Even though it will help preserve freedom, we're not going to invade such-and-such country because people don’t enjoy seeing war footage on the nightly news."

Name the last time a Clinton did anything without looking at opinion polls. "I'm for the war. Now, I'm against it. I'm against the troop surge, but if it starts working I might change my mind."

Who does that sound like?

Hillary Clinton?

Yes, but also Barack Obama. Sure, Mr. Obama was against the war from the get-go, but lately I've been hearing a lot less, “Get the troops out of Iraq immediately,” from the President-elect.

I suppose it's a good thing that his worldview won't really affect policy, because he'll just do what the majority of us think is best.

On the other hand, I was hoping to have someone smarter than the majority of us running the country.

The President is like a parent in that he must do things for our own good, regardless of whether or not the masses agree. And by not giving him the benefit of the doubt, you act like children.

If a single father has three kids and they all vote to ban baths, does that make baths evil? By your logic it does, simply because 75% of the household is anti-bath. Of course baths are not evil, and that's why the dad makes sure that, despite protests, everyone takes one at night or in the morning; something the children will thank him for when they get older.

Just as America will thank President Bush when history proves he has done the right thing an overwhelming majority of the time.

I’m sure, in response to this article, liberals will say, "Why would we go along with Bush's asinine policies!?"

Too bad the same liberals who say that, also say, "Even though you'll disagree with every policy he implements, you should give Barack Obama a chance to lead. He is, after all, our President."

Led by the mainstream media, I'm sure the ignorant childlike adults of the United States will declare that Barack Obama is doing a great job, which will keep his approval rating high.

But you know what, if the single father I spoke about earlier cut out baths, tooth-brushing and vegetables from the lives of his children, I'm sure his approval rating would be off the charts among members of his household.

Would that mean he's doing a good job?

Oh contraire.

Let's Pretend Barack Obama Doesn't Win

I know the liberal talking points insist the United States is in such great turmoil that a Democrat taking the White House in 2008 is inevitable.

But, just for my amusement, let's say Barack Obama doesn't win the 2008 Presidential Election. Because if McCain is somehow victorious in the election I can't wait to hear your attempt to try and woo Hillary Clinton back to the forefront.

Barack Obama won the nomination because of the extreme far left wing of the Democratic Party, and a loss to John McCain will mean, by the end of McCain's first term, the only Democrat who will have occupied the White House in 32 years is a member of the Clinton family.

You Dems finally found a couple that Americans will actually vote for and you're not smart enough to nominate the one remaining who is still eligible to represent your party in the general election!

I know you Democrats control Congress and therefore it's a given that Obama will be victorious. But do you realize the only reason you control Washington is because the American people are too chicken to understand we're in a real war and have to face terrorism head on, i.e. wage war against the terrorists?

Obama won the nomination because of the far left; if he loses Democrats will be forced to come to grips with the fact that far left people can't get elected in general elections.

It's not that difficult to comprehend: A Clinton one once, a Clinton can win again.

It's kind of like a plain Jane who starts dating a guy out of her league. He lavishes attention on her and gives her confidence. Then she thinks to herself, "If this guy likes me, they'll all like me, therefore I must be able to find someone better looking and richer." Then the girl breaks up with the boy and spends the rest of her life alone, all the while regretting her decision.

Republicans know when we've got something good.

Even though George H.W. Bush lost his reelection bid to Bill Clinton we Republicans were smart enough to realize that people would vote for a member of the Bush family for President and nominated George W. Bush in 2000. Guess what? He won.

Unfortunately you moderate Democrats aren't influential enough to make sure your party nominates someone with a chance to win.

Oh wait, sorry, for the time being I have to pretend Barack Obama will win the general election because those on the far left are absolutely certain this will be the case.

But in the event Obama loses, or the election is "stolen" from him, you need to create a sales pitch that would convince her to run again in 2012.

Here's my idea.

"Hillary you are our god. Like Eve eating of the apple we shamefully doubted your wisdom and infinite knowledge. We were worshipping a false idol. As the Christian God does, we ask you to forgive us of our sin. We will never again doubt your power. As soon as your beautiful and talented daughter Chelsea turns 35 we will of course nominate her, provided she keeps her maiden name. After her terms are up we will nominate her husband, provided he hyphenates his last name where it reads something like Doug Smith-Clinton or even Doug Clinton-Smith. Please, we will do whatever we need to make this right. We love you, Hillary Clinton, and we were wrong for ever wavering in our devotion to you."

Whatever it is, Democrats, it better be sincere and it better show just how sick you are that you pissed off the people responsible for stopping "Democrat President" from becoming an oxy-moron.