On an average day, how many sane people do run across? I know I can count on one hand how many reasonable people with whom I come in contact.
In other words, the amount of people with their heads on straight in this country and around the world is extremely low.
So it doesn't bother me that these freaks think President Bush is doing a bad job.
Most people's belief system is so out of whack it would concern me if they agreed with the President's policies. So why is everyone up in arms about Bush's low approval ratings?
That's why President Bush is a great President. He doesn't care about approval unless it's self-approval. If he approves of himself then he's doing a good job. That's the bottom line and his only concern. After all, we didn't elect him to do what we wanted; we elected him to do what he wanted.
When you leave your house every day do you act in accordance with the wants and needs of others, or do you act how you want you to act?
And what do we call those who live their lives accommodating the wishes of others? We call them spineless cowards.
It's liberals who always pay attention to the polls. "We'll only change things if people want them changed," is what they say. "Even though it will help preserve freedom, we're not going to invade such-and-such country because people don’t enjoy seeing war footage on the nightly news."
Name the last time a
Who does that sound like?
Hillary Clinton?
Yes, but also Barack Obama. Sure, Mr. Obama was against the war from the get-go, but lately I've been hearing a lot less, “Get the troops out of
I suppose it's a good thing that his worldview won't really affect policy, because he'll just do what the majority of us think is best.
On the other hand, I was hoping to have someone smarter than the majority of us running the country.
The President is like a parent in that he must do things for our own good, regardless of whether or not the masses agree. And by not giving him the benefit of the doubt, you act like children.
If a single father has three kids and they all vote to ban baths, does that make baths evil? By your logic it does, simply because 75% of the household is anti-bath. Of course baths are not evil, and that's why the dad makes sure that, despite protests, everyone takes one at night or in the morning; something the children will thank him for when they get older.
Just as
I’m sure, in response to this article, liberals will say, "Why would we go along with Bush's asinine policies!?"
Too bad the same liberals who say that, also say, "Even though you'll disagree with every policy he implements, you should give Barack Obama a chance to lead. He is, after all, our President."
Led by the mainstream media, I'm sure the ignorant childlike adults of the
But you know what, if the single father I spoke about earlier cut out baths, tooth-brushing and vegetables from the lives of his children, I'm sure his approval rating would be off the charts among members of his household.
Would that mean he's doing a good job?
No comments:
Post a Comment